
While the content is interesting I think the dry nature of how the information is delivered made me feel like was just li reading lecture notes which is not bad but not what I was expecting which is probably what lowered my rating of the book. If you are interested in this part of history it can give you a good understanding of the period and the context of the Byzantine empire
I think this book is a good read to have an understanding of one the foundational texts in linguistic philosophy and understanding where many modern theories have their basis. Building on that I think I would only recommend this book to those which are really interested in learning about linguistic philosophy.
I can't really put this book into words it's weird and creepy and fantastic and gross and horrible and deep and shallow. It's a true piece of horror. It will stay with me racking my brain for a long time.
I don't know where I could start or finish this review besides saying how satisfied I was with it
The golem myth is one that I hold close to heart. I feel like this book is rooted in the reality of our time while keeping the fantasy alive. I think the book touches amazingly on the ideas of Jewish identity and modern issues.
While I could wax on poetic about the golem and imagery I'll leave it to a video essay by Jacob Geller https://youtu.be/pUBVSH6hBvY?si=Fu7XljKymGa5sbGO
Pinker does an excellent job exploring universal grammar (UG) and expanding upon Chomsky's work. He lays down great arguments for why language instinct and UG should be the model to be expanded upon while explaining succinctly the shortcomings of other theories. The book is definitely aged with many of it's references of artificial intelligence (AI) aging it and rooting it in the time the book was written I think it still raises many questions that we can look to answer even to this day.
I think this book will remain one that I go back to for quotes and facts such as the hierarchy of vowels and constants leading to how we come up with certain phrases (razzle-dazzle). I would recommend this book for anyone interested in linguistics and human cognition.
While the author does a good job explaining himself and the thesis of the book I feel as though it devolves from the thesis that knowledge is lost when a language dies to just listing language features of endangered languages.
While I understand and agree cultural knowledge is lost when a language dies I remain unconvinced that ‘actual' knowledge is. I even believe the authors co-signing of the statement that any idea can be expressed in any language showcases the issues with the thesis.
I remain open to the idea and will see if any other literature persuades me.
I think this book highlights a lot of the issues with the intelligence machine of the US without being one of those books that purely villainizes the CIA as a boogie man and actually, shines a light on many of the shortcomings that may be otherwise unknown if you only believe the hype that you see from conspiracy theories and propaganda
Guy Deutscher lays out the best arguments for linguistic relativity (relative to the time of publication 2010) and I feel for me they fall flat, I've read much on the subject including some of the research papers cited in this book. While I do not contend that language plays no role in effecting our thought I believe the way in which it is exemplified leaves more to be wanting. I think the fact that the actual difference is not described for many of the experiments on color in the last chapter feels like we are being kept in darkness so we accept the difference is relevant to a great extent. I think the information presented in this book would be better suited had Guy revealed the actual objective metrics instead just saying what metrics exist (ie give the actual difference in reaction time rather than just saying there was a difference in reaction time).
A book which left me wanting I feel like I didn't learn or gain anything from this book and it felt like I was reading from ‘policy winks' from twitter. I think the information is important but I think this book is for someone with less political knowledge and is a good starting point. Even if I say positive it's hard for me to give it higher than 2 stars for me personally
I read this for a book the other reviews do a good job bringing up critiques about both the story and the author. If you can move past that l, the story is moving and interesting I do have doubts about certain things and wish that the story was unmarred by the controversy surrounding the author and her story