
Updated a reading goal:
Read 4k pages in 2026
Progress so far: 1982 / 4444 44%
Updated a reading goal:
Read 4k pages in 2026
Progress so far: 1778 / 4444 40%
Updated a reading goal:
Read 4k pages in 2026
Progress so far: 1189 / 4444 26%
Updated a reading goal:
Read 4k pages in 2026
Progress so far: 838 / 4444 18%

Added to listSophie’s Bookshelfwith 100 books.

Added to listSophie’s Bookshelfwith 97 books.
Updated a reading goal:
Read 4k pages in 2026
Progress so far: 184 / 4444 4%

Not Thurstons best work
The book easily should have been restructured. It starts off in technical detail describing the slow process of a certain theory in boilers explosions before, but not 50 pages in does it switch to the main theme of explosions being mainly a case of bad management or construction. After proposing that second theory it’s a bit of a slog as it explains all the different boiler parts that could be mismanaged, but the last 50 pages or so just being analysis of historical explosions relating to the likely causes brings it back from the deep theoretical cases it was mentioning before. I do like the setup of the book in that it was a response to a letter from the US Secretary of Treasury asking Thurston how to reduce boiler explosion incidents and the final page being a 9 step list of all reasons and actions you should take to prevent explosions in the future
Definitely not a book I would recommend, but one with a couple interesting chapters for those studying older scientific research processes
Not Thurstons best work
The book easily should have been restructured. It starts off in technical detail describing the slow process of a certain theory in boilers explosions before, but not 50 pages in does it switch to the main theme of explosions being mainly a case of bad management or construction. After proposing that second theory it’s a bit of a slog as it explains all the different boiler parts that could be mismanaged, but the last 50 pages or so just being analysis of historical explosions relating to the likely causes brings it back from the deep theoretical cases it was mentioning before. I do like the setup of the book in that it was a response to a letter from the US Secretary of Treasury asking Thurston how to reduce boiler explosion incidents and the final page being a 9 step list of all reasons and actions you should take to prevent explosions in the future
Definitely not a book I would recommend, but one with a couple interesting chapters for those studying older scientific research processes

Re-read of a book I loved in highschool, holds up pretty well especially for a 2008 book. Has a bunch of interesting cybersecurity concepts relating to the 9/11 attacks and the Patriot Act.
There were some parts that felt unnecessary. It has throwaway sentences talking about random peoples on the streets outfits and how it relates to pop culture. That could be construed as connected, but other times Cory Doctorow just described the lore of a street in San Francisco for multiple pages longer then needed. Still it jumps back to its core dilemna quite often and is a pretty good piece on a more technical side of protesting
Re-read of a book I loved in highschool, holds up pretty well especially for a 2008 book. Has a bunch of interesting cybersecurity concepts relating to the 9/11 attacks and the Patriot Act.
There were some parts that felt unnecessary. It has throwaway sentences talking about random peoples on the streets outfits and how it relates to pop culture. That could be construed as connected, but other times Cory Doctorow just described the lore of a street in San Francisco for multiple pages longer then needed. Still it jumps back to its core dilemna quite often and is a pretty good piece on a more technical side of protesting