The framing story of Cork's childhood friends was very compelling.

A thorough discussion of the fundamentals of the measurement problem in QM. Mostly readable.

Another excellent entry in the series

Well written contemporary thriller

The best of the Cork series so far. The Henry Meloux story was great.

I enjoyed this despite two major flaws: the author making up conversations and ideas in people's heads that he couldn't possibly know, and the dizzy number of characters.

This book was kind of depressing. The protagonist, Joe Pickett, is not that bright, not that brave, has a crappy low-paying job in a dying town. Somewhat redeemed by the ending, I don't have any interest in seeing more of Joe.

This is a very Christian, English book and I am not saying that pejoratively. It's full of Christian history, Christian worship, Christian legends, etc. Ditto for the England parts. The protagonist is not a very interesting or nice person upon examination, some of which he does himself.

This book is repetitive, repetitive, repetitive. The author does a good job describing the history of the ideas and giving snapshots of the most important physicists, but he repeats the ideas of quantum foundations over and over, much more than is necessary. The ending is also poor, where he tries and fails to draw a grand synthesis, especially including a nanny scolding regarding why aren't more physicists studying philosophy, rather than asking what value philosophy has at all.

A beautifully produced book, with thick pages and color figures. If you're interested in higher-level Sudoku questions, like how many unique boards there are or what is the minimum number of clues necessary to solve, and are more than usually mathematically schooled, this is the book for you.

I wish the author would have stuck to the title. While written ina relentlessly breezy style, it's great when she talks about archaeology, not so much when she talks about her husband, her son and several woke chapters about women and gays in archaeology. She's a person of science; why should she care if the discoverer of science is gay, straight, female, male, etc?
I'm also flabbergasted that a book devoted to the cutting edge of archaeology has almost no mention of Israel. She skips through it on her round the world tour, devoting many paragraphs to say, Afghanistan, but nothing about a place, like Egypt, where they have been digging for more than a century. And she calls wine that would have come from Israel or Judea in 1000 CE “Palestinian” wine. Palestine would not exist for more than a thousand years later.
Also, why does she use the outdated “AD” and “BC” instead of the modern scholarly “CE” and “BCE”? In any case, “AD” properly goes before a date, not after it.

A big step down from the author's previous books. This reads like a YA novel. Characters constantly telling each other how much they love them. Suarez's previous books have explored the near future of scary technology. I'm not sure if the science is accurate or not in this book.

What a disappointment! Bowden is a good writer but this book is nothing but tedious, consisting almost entirely of recorded prison interviews with a low-life liar. No real insights. Stay away.

An improvement from his last few. Overall good, but the final fight is kind of silly.

Colorful but not very interesting. Repetitive.

Some background explanation of how Michener came to write Centennial. For hard-core fans.

Better than average mystery and lots of Alaskan background.

I was surprised at how much dialogue and how little action there was. The book reads exactly like the TV series.

As good as the other two in the series.

Warning: this book does not stand alone; it's part of a series and very little is resolved at the end of this volume. There's no warning about that - shame! Also, the repetitiveness is great; each thought the protagonist has, he has three times. Stay away.

Same good quality as the first one in the series

The author knows his Houdini stuff!

I'm not sure, but I think the black and white one was better

Magnificent.
One thing would have helped this American reader: an explanation of how British politics works, what the titles mean (“Lord Privy Seal?”, what the parties stands are, etc.