That was really clever and a lot of fun. The audio version added some texture to it too, I think, with the different voices the narrator performed for the different stories.

The story is based on a cool concept and it's creepy (body horror, cosmic horror), but I don't like this writing style. It's very vivid and the word choices are surprising, and that is just not my taste as a reader anymore.

This writing style is very literary and maybe not best suited to audio format. If I check out this author again, I'll be sure to read instead of listen.

I liked this better than the first Richard Kadrey story in this collection but didn't love it. I have liked second person in short stories before, but it just made me mildly uncomfortable here.

I liked this. Very scary if you have any sort of fear of spiders, which I do. Starting to wonder why I embarked on this “let's listen to horror stories” project, but I've never been one to back off from my terrible ideas. I definitely like Paul Tremblay's writing style. It really draws you in.

What was even the point of that?

This is an interesting concept and I might enjoy a longer work from this author, but I feel this story was too short to explore the ideas it presented.

The surface narrative of this short story didn't really work for me, and I also don't much like the writing style. But I can see the whole thing as a metaphor, and I do admire that underlying story. It's an interesting piece of writing, and it might be a good choice for a group discussion.

This is excellent. I loved it. CW for animal harm

Lots of reviews are praising this story, but to me, the whole concept seems very disrespectful, in several different ways. If this had been the first story I would not have kept going with the anthology.