Amanda
I wasn't in love with Emily Wilde's Encyclopaedia of Faeries, but I did enjoy it just enough to be interested in reading the next book in the series.
As with the first book, I enjoyed the story more than the characters; although I thought they came off a little better here—especially Emily, who wasn't making so many amateurish mistakes.
Fawcett once again did a good job at incorporating faerie lore into the story, although I still think the journal format is a pointless affectation.
I'm not just interested, but eager to read book three.
Received via NetGalley.
I wasn't in love with Emily Wilde's Encyclopaedia of Faeries, but I did enjoy it just enough to be interested in reading the next book in the series.
As with the first book, I enjoyed the story more than the characters; although I thought they came off a little better here—especially Emily, who wasn't making so many amateurish mistakes.
Fawcett once again did a good job at incorporating faerie lore into the story, although I still think the journal format is a pointless affectation.
I'm not just interested, but eager to read book three.
Received via NetGalley.