It's a little too thriller-y for me, and I think the premise worked better as a short story. I would have liked denser worldbuilding around how instancing works -- the book operates on Sliders logic, in the sense that this alternate universe only diverges from the real world in the circumscribed limits that are relevant to the narrative or can be used to make a point or allusion.
Like far too much contemporary literature, this book leans on the present tense to make the story feel more immediate. It also swaps between second-person and third-person to distinguish between two different kinds of POV, which I found annoying.
The themes are lovely, though, and richly explored! That just works better for me in a short story than a 350 page novel.
Contains spoilers
I didn't expect much from this because I bounced off the serialized version on the SCP wiki, but it improved a lot in the editing process!
I love that it just ran with the concept and let it get as crazy as possible. My favorite bit was the huge antimemetic leviathan skull that they turned into a meeting room with built-in idea containment.
The writing is basically fine. It's all written in the present tense which I always find a bit annoying. The use of black boxes as 'censorship' feels a bit overdone to me at this point, but that may be because I've spent too much time reading SCPs.
I thought using memetics as a lens to explore how fascism captures and corrupts people was a very fun angle, and a good way to tie all the interesting bits here into a cohesive novel.
I read this in the middle of Cyteen to understand some of the references to it in that book.
40,000 in Gehenna is basically fine if you like pulp sci-fi or are really into the alliance-union universe. It's not as packed with interesting ideas as some of Cherryh's other work. That's not to say there's nothing here -- you just have to dig through some not-very-interesting set building to get to it. I think Cyteen's references back to this book actually do more with the ideas than the book itself does.
Contains spoilers
This was a bit disappointing compared to the planetfall novels! Many of the stories feel like perfunctory writing exercises, elaborating on very minor characters (for example, the person running the grocery truck that Carl buys food from at the beginning of After Atlas) who don't have much of anything interesting going on.
However, I quite liked the first story and the author interview at the end! They were worth the price of admission for me.
"Tailor Made" -- a story about a man who designs adverts for clothing produced in sweatshops, who is forced to reckon with the choices he makes -- was also a fun read, simple but cathartic.
I don't usually like “cozy” books at all, and this doesn't feel like it should be an exception. There's virtually no plot and the prose is written like a therapist giving a canned speech about how neurodiversity can be a strength, but the setting and characters really won me over.
It probably wouldn't have landed for me if I didn't grow up watching TNG, though
This feels like an overlong plot summary of a really good 800 page book. I love a lot of the ideas but it skips around so much and is so light on descriptive detail that the middle ~200 pages reads like a wookiepedia article. I'm so interested in the setting that I'm still going to try the next book though, lol. I loved Exordia so I'm hoping this book is just suffering from being a debut novel
Note that this book is incomplete. Most of the content is on a website you have to go to on your browser instead of on the actual book.
What is in the book is primarily argument by metaphor. It's totally unconvincing.
I do agree with the premise,
‘if anyone builds artificial superintelligence using anything like current techniques, everyone on earth will die', by the principle of explosion.
It's like saying ‘if someone develops an ftl drive using anything like our current understanding of physics, puppies will inherit the earth'
There's a lot of fascinating ideas packed in here, and the thriller pacing makes it go down easy. My biggest problems with it are Elmira's totally pointless chapters and how often Nayler repeats important lines as if he's worried you'll miss them.
I think his prose has improved quite a bit from mountain and the sea, though! This is close to 4 stars for me
This is the most banal depiction of hell I've ever read.
The book has a YA/video game style ‘roller coaster' plotline – our characters are pulled helplessly from Level 1 to Level 8 in order – except the roller coaster isn't even interesting. Hell is just a college campus spread over an otherwise featureless desert.
It has the same problems as Kuang's other period pieces, Babel and The Poppy War: it's thinly researched and there's not even an attempt to match the language of the period.
The only bright light for me was Alice's rich and well-realized internal narrative.
In the notes and references, Watts writes:
“Although free will is one of Echopraxia's central themes ... I don't have much to say about it because the arguments seem so clear-cut as to be uninteresting”
One wonders why he wrote the book!
There are some clever ideas in here, but it lacks Blindsight's density and cohesion.