Phil
a book with interesting content, but that reads like a first draft, and in some places like preliminary bullet notes. Extremely repetitive, awful grammar, no table of contents, and despite claiming academic rigour, not a single reference to sources in the text. It also claims that all quotes wil be properly cited, and there isn’t a single quote in the entire work
A good and potentially significant work seriously marred by the downsides of self-publishing. A professional editor could move this from one and a half stars, to five.
a book with interesting content, but that reads like a first draft, and in some places like preliminary bullet notes. Extremely repetitive, awful grammar, no table of contents, and despite claiming academic rigour, not a single reference to sources in the text. It also claims that all quotes wil be properly cited, and there isn’t a single quote in the entire work
A good and potentially significant work seriously marred by the downsides of self-publishing. A professional editor could move this from one and a half stars, to five.
