I do not care for Galligan's drawing style (which reminds me of Archie comics) after having enjoyed Telegmeirer's interpretations for the first 4 books. I'm probably more bothered by this than I should be.

Very interesting premise about how politicized and manipulated Russia's history is.

An interesting story about bullying. While I enjoyed the premise and writing, I'd hesitate to give this to a modern kid because of how gendered it is, which is very reflective of the time it was written.

I was so excited by the plot but I can't enjoy this style of writing; it's too disjointed and choppy for my tastes.

Overall, sweet and well-executed so I can see why this series is popular. It reminds me of Frederick Backman but without the obnoxious philosophizing. I'm not sure it's quite my cup of tea but I already bought the second book so I'll read more of this series I'm sure.

I don't actually recall reading the novels as a kid but I know I did and this is scratching some kinda nostalgia itch for me.

The pacing is glacial and I don't like Ishiguro enough to struggle thru.

Objectively this was well-done but I found myself bored as hell cause it was all very predictable. I will not be reading the rest of the trilogy because I do not have the time to waste.

After I bought this book, I heard the miniseries was better so I watched it and I do not feel the need to read the book now. The miniseries was very entertaining with an innovtive plot.

A brisk, pleasant read. Despite the Korean setting, it feels very much like a standard Anglo-American mystery, particularly the male main character's attitude. My only complaint is the book lacked a glossary/pronunciation guide.

So thorough it's boring. Neiwert presents his evidence like a journalist would and his writing is clear but it's a bit amorphous in scope with far too many lengthy examples. An index would make it more useful and I'm puzzled it doesn't have one.

I picked this up cause it's just so damn pretty but this tome personifies “don't judge a book by its cover” with how boring it is. DNF.

Beautifully written, fully-fleshed characters, perfect pacing. Overall an amazing read. I would, however, have liked an author note telling me which bits are supported by history and which are total fabrications so I'm denying 5 full stars because I consider that important.

Short and concise but didn't give me any real insights and it reinforces the idea that doctors are smarter than patients. (Almost anyone with a chronic disease knows how laughable this is.)

I'm going to stop feeling like I should read this author just because she's hugely popular. I got a couple pages in and went, “who fucking cares?!” There's far too many good books out there for me to waste my precious energy.

Pretty meh. The writing is dull, although thorough. The artwork is utilitarian.

The twist of the perfect ending was very clever.

A charmingly absurd tale but the illustrations are superlative and I will be seeking out more of vanDusen's work.