Harry
My second Bevins after The Jakarta Method. Once again, deeply researched and gripping.
The premise is sharp: the 2010s saw the largest protests in human history—so where are the results? Bevins tracks ten movements (Tahrir, Gezi, Hong Kong, Chile, and others), weaving common threads into a coherent picture of failure.
The core insight is the political vacuum. Horizontalist movements are too slow; by the time they reach consensus, the moment has passed. If you don't seize power with organized force, someone else will. Accountability to the people can only be built after—through a party that is of the people, accountable to them, indistinguishable from them.
Minus one star for the anti-Chinese and anti-Soviet dogma. This is the price of a major press release. It doesn't undermine the core premise, but it's a reminder that so much of what gets published must perform ideological compliance.
Essential reading for understanding why the 2010s burned so brightly and achieved so little.
My second Bevins after The Jakarta Method. Once again, deeply researched and gripping.
The premise is sharp: the 2010s saw the largest protests in human history—so where are the results? Bevins tracks ten movements (Tahrir, Gezi, Hong Kong, Chile, and others), weaving common threads into a coherent picture of failure.
The core insight is the political vacuum. Horizontalist movements are too slow; by the time they reach consensus, the moment has passed. If you don't seize power with organized force, someone else will. Accountability to the people can only be built after—through a party that is of the people, accountable to them, indistinguishable from them.
Minus one star for the anti-Chinese and anti-Soviet dogma. This is the price of a major press release. It doesn't undermine the core premise, but it's a reminder that so much of what gets published must perform ideological compliance.
Essential reading for understanding why the 2010s burned so brightly and achieved so little.