hc.newton
This originally appeared at The Irresponsible Reader as part of a quick takes post to catch up. The point of these posts is to be pithy, not thorough (as I typically strive for). --- This is quotable, clever, and filled with interesting characters. It's also a little too convoluted; it's hard to believe some of the interpersonal relationships with the characters, and the solution is a bit of a letdown.
That said, from the first page to the last I was hooked and couldn't stop reading it. Most of it worked in the moment, or was something I could shrug off while reading it. But when I was done and started thinking about it, I the doubts and quibbles kept growing.
Maybe Sandlin couldn't really figure out the book he was trying to write—tone, characters, and/or outcome—he wouldn't be the first author to do that. As much as a lot of the passages sang—the book, in retrospect, was just good enough. Read this one to enjoy the journey, not necessarily the destination.
Originally posted at irresponsiblereader.com.
This originally appeared at The Irresponsible Reader as part of a quick takes post to catch up. The point of these posts is to be pithy, not thorough (as I typically strive for). --- This is quotable, clever, and filled with interesting characters. It's also a little too convoluted; it's hard to believe some of the interpersonal relationships with the characters, and the solution is a bit of a letdown.
That said, from the first page to the last I was hooked and couldn't stop reading it. Most of it worked in the moment, or was something I could shrug off while reading it. But when I was done and started thinking about it, I the doubts and quibbles kept growing.
Maybe Sandlin couldn't really figure out the book he was trying to write—tone, characters, and/or outcome—he wouldn't be the first author to do that. As much as a lot of the passages sang—the book, in retrospect, was just good enough. Read this one to enjoy the journey, not necessarily the destination.
Originally posted at irresponsiblereader.com.