I think I would have DNF this one if I was not reading it for uni. Not that it was bad, quite the opposite, but the graphic depiction of incestual abuse and rape was too much for me. (I also wish more people had pointed out the incest of this book as it doesn't show right away when looking at the content warnings)
The audiobook is narrated by the author which fitted her style and stream of consciousness narration perfectly.
A great book but I am so glad I'm done reading it and will most certainly never pick it up again.
Contains spoilers
I've really mixed feelings about this book. It was undoubtedly very interesting but I struggled to understand to whom this book was written. It seems sometimes too basic for a professional and sometimes too precise for a non-professional, especially when describing traumatic experiences. I also felt this book could have benefited from a bit more inclusion, especially considering how recently it was published. The only example I have currently in mind is homosexuality: if I remember correctly the only mention of homosexuality was (TW: SA) to describe a heterosexual man who had “homosexual contact” “compulsion” until cured of trauma when he stopped those “compulsions” to instead go fishing. The various sexist comments were so tiring, I cannot count the number of times I sighed hearing the word “promiscuity”.
I'm still glad to find psychology material that addresses the real world and politics at least a bit. The bar is very low.