Aerith Netzer
The greatest psycho-social work of the early 20th century. It certainly is different from most of Freud’s previous works, yet also his most forward-looking. The assertion that the origin of neuroticism in humans is attributable to the oppressive forces of social propriety as a consequence of civilization is certainly still compelling today. Second-rate students of psychology (indeed, of history) seem to balk at mention of Freud’s libidinous origin of consciousness, due to a seemingly instinctual defense of the contemporary status-quo of psychological inquiry. These students, failing to account for the historical surroundings and biography of Freud’s life, remain ignorant of their asinine readings, rather than reading this text for what it was: that of a jewish proto-sociologist attempting to interpret the utter cruelty of humans in the years leading to the devastating wars of the 20th century.
The greatest psycho-social work of the early 20th century. It certainly is different from most of Freud’s previous works, yet also his most forward-looking. The assertion that the origin of neuroticism in humans is attributable to the oppressive forces of social propriety as a consequence of civilization is certainly still compelling today. Second-rate students of psychology (indeed, of history) seem to balk at mention of Freud’s libidinous origin of consciousness, due to a seemingly instinctual defense of the contemporary status-quo of psychological inquiry. These students, failing to account for the historical surroundings and biography of Freud’s life, remain ignorant of their asinine readings, rather than reading this text for what it was: that of a jewish proto-sociologist attempting to interpret the utter cruelty of humans in the years leading to the devastating wars of the 20th century.
The greatest psycho-social work of the early 20th century. It certainly is different from most of Freud’s previous works, yet also his most forward-looking. The assertion that the origin of neuroticism in humans is attributable to the oppressive forces of social propriety as a consequence of civilization is certainly still compelling today. Second-rate students of psychology (indeed, of history) seem to balk at mention of Freud’s libidinous origin of consciousness, due to a seemingly instinctual defense of the contemporary status-quo of psychological inquiry. These students, failing to account for the historical surroundings and biography of Freud’s life, remain ignorant of their asinine readings, rather than reading this text for what it was: that of a jewish proto-sociologist attempting to interpret the utter cruelty of humans in the years leading to the devastating wars of the 20th century.
The greatest psycho-social work of the early 20th century. It certainly is different from most of Freud’s previous works, yet also his most forward-looking. The assertion that the origin of neuroticism in humans is attributable to the oppressive forces of social propriety as a consequence of civilization is certainly still compelling today. Second-rate students of psychology (indeed, of history) seem to balk at mention of Freud’s libidinous origin of consciousness, due to a seemingly instinctual defense of the contemporary status-quo of psychological inquiry. These students, failing to account for the historical surroundings and biography of Freud’s life, remain ignorant of their asinine readings, rather than reading this text for what it was: that of a jewish proto-sociologist attempting to interpret the utter cruelty of humans in the years leading to the devastating wars of the 20th century.
