Dead in the Water
Dead in the Water
Ratings1
Average rating4
This originally appeared at The Irresponsible Reader.
—
WHAT'S DEAD IN THE WATER ABOUT?
Rivalries between small towns are nothing new, and when they can find their focus in a small—and relatively meaningless—athletic competition, they can take on an intensity that belies their significance. Add a cash award on top of a long-standing rivalry? All bets are off. That's exactly what happened between the neighboring towns of Stonebridge and Meadowfield with the annual Stonebridge Regatta.
Things get a little tenser this particular year when the captain of the Stonebridge team (who was not particularly liked by his team, but he still was one of their own) is found dead in the water. The authorities concluded it was an accidental drowning, but his widow doesn't accept that conclusion. Matthew Henderson was far too cautious around the water for something like that to happen.
Elena Henderson is an old friend of Adam Whyte's mother, and like many people in Stonebridge was familiar with his recent success in finding the murderer of his friend. She asks him to look into her husband's death for her. So Adam recruits his friend Colin to come along for another adventure and the two see if they can find that kind of success again.
TOO MUCH CHARACTER GROWTH?
Part of the charm of The Curious Dispatch of Daniel Costello was how much Adam's confidence exceeded his (and Colin's) ability, and yet they somehow blundered onto the solution. They're clever obviously, but they're amateurs and they acted that way.
In the ensuing month, their success and fleeting local fame were the push that Adam needed to get off his mother's couch and get serious about life (for at least a while). Not only that, but when approached by the widow, Adam's reflexive reaction was to know that he wasn't qualified. He feels bad for her and wants to help, so he agrees to look into it. While that may really be the right reaction, the realistic reaction, but we don't turn to this kind of thing for realism, do we? A month of personal growth is enough to banish his overconfidence?
Now, these are things I thought of when sitting down to write this post, and not things that came up when I was reading. In the moment, I was just curious about finding out who killed Henderson and enjoying Adam and Colin. That's the important part—it worked while reading, and only made me wonder in retrospect. Also, I'm not opposed to these two growing up—I just wonder about the pacing of it.
And also, Adam's still a clueless and self-focused twerp when it comes to dealing with his mother, so, it's not like he's suddenly grown up—and there are plenty of ways his maturity can stumble in future installments if McDonald doesn't want him to be well-adjusted.
The Sherlock/Watson-ish nature of the relationship that Adam foisted on Colin is pretty much gone—at least in the typical Holmes feel. To stick with those two as exemplars, in this novella, Adam and Colin function largely like Holmes and Watson in the last couple of Elementary seasons. Not quite equals, but close to it—Adam's still expected to do the big thinking, but the labor and thinking pretty equally divided. It's easier to see the two being friends this way, rather than Colin being pushed around by Adam like it frequently seemed in the previous adventure.
SO, WHAT DID I THINK ABOUT DEAD IN THE WATER?
Like its predecessor Dead in the Water is a quick and enjoyable read, not quite as comic this time—but there were plenty of grins and chuckles to be found. Colin's undercover work on the rival town's rowing team, in particular, comes to mind there, as does a tip of the cap to one of McDonald's podcast co-hosts (Adam has a comic highlight—with a bonus Narnia quip that I probably laughed out loud at—but I can't even allude to it without ruining it).
I guessed the killer pretty quickly, but it didn't affect my enjoyment that much. It was a well-constructed whodunit that provided plenty of opportunities for the reader to pick up on things that Adam missed (and vice versa).
One of the advantages of the novella-length is that McDonald has no opportunity to let “dull parts” step in. Everything that happens propels the story forward or gives us what we need for the characters. Lean prose and not a wasted word keep things moving for the reader and help to keep this as pure fun. I'm absolutely ready to return to Stonebridge to see if these two can find yet another murder in this small town.