Ratings2
Average rating3
Reviews with the most likes.
Essays av det som mange omtaler som USAs fremste forfatter (Philip Roth bl.a.), og på sitt beste er dette tekster som overgår det aller meste jeg har lest i litterær kvalitet: En miljøseie til Kina, eller til øya Alejandro Selkirk utenfor kysten av Chile, en tekst om forfatteren Alice Munro, eller et forsøk på å få til et personlig intervju med staten New York, språklig avansert og utbroderende i ren og skjør ordgytende eleganse. Men innimellom og i andre essays blir det så elegant og ordgytende at bokstavene står i veien for teksten. Også sammensetningen av essays er ujevn, jeg klarer ikke finne bokens røde tråd annet enn at Franzen har samlet ulike tekster som er samlet fordi det er mulig, ikke fordi de har en sammenheng.
Framzen er ekstremt dyktig, men det er forskjell på dyktig og riktig.
Når det er sagt: Denne boken vil vokse og vokse på meg, og om et år vil det å ha karaktersatt den virke meningsløst.
Here is a story about Jonathan Franzen: I read [b:The Corrections 3805 The Corrections Jonathan Franzen http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1355011305s/3805.jpg 941200] several years ago, perhaps just after it was at its zeitgeistiest. Yes that's a word. What are you looking at.Anyway, I remembered really liking it, and several years later when I found myself contemplating a fairly limited audiobook selection at my parents' home library, I checked out an audio version of the Corrections and listened to most of it on a trip. It was not as good as I remembered it being, but I thought, well maybe now my tastes are more SOPHISTICATED. I had listened to something like 9 of 10 discs of it and then had to return it to their library. I decided to get the audiobook from my home library so I could finish the last disc. Then I realized that my parents' library had the ABRIDGED version and the real version was at least 20 discs long. I was unwilling to dedicate the time to listening to the entire 20 discs, but I think that The Corrections was probably at least as good as I had remembered it being. Jonathan Franzen uses a LOT of words, but by God, he earns them. **OK I wrote all of that as a note when I added this book but before I started listening to itlikeis Jonathan Franzen parodying himself? Likewhen he goes to China to investigate the factory where his puffin golf club cover is made, because he loves birds sooo much......is that for real.When he suggests that maybe if David Foster Wallace had gotten into birdwatching, he wouldn't have committed suicide...is that for real??There are some good essays in this collection, but I think I already read them all on the internet already, and then there are just like A BILLION OF JONATHAN FRANZEN'S THOUGHTS ABOUT BIRDS. I used to feel bad for Franzen because he was forever going to be known as DFW's less-talented friend but now I think I feel bad because he's so obsessed with birds?? Oh I forgot there are also some hilariously crotchety thoughts in here about technology, like literally he is mad when people end cell phone conversations with “Love you!” Go put a bird on it, Franzen.