This originally appeared at The Irresponsible Reader. I also posted a nifty Q&A with the author.
—
WHAT'S MADNESS OF THE Q ABOUT?
Simply put, it's the further adventures of professor Sam Teagarden following his uncovering of a large conspiracy within the FBI in 2018's Flight of the Fox. In the six years since then, a slight mythology has built up around him—he's got a reputation as one who'll bring the truth to the world—when all he wants to do is teach math and spend time with his wife.
But it's his reputation that brings him into the middle of this particular situation. One group wants someone like him to bring information to the forefront of the world, no matter the cost. Another group is afraid of people like him and targets him for assassination before he even knows that there's something to be exposed to the world. But the FBI catches wind about this before the assassin makes an attempt and saves his life. They also would like him to be involved in a current case, his reputation alone should make things calmer.
What's the case? Well, the previously theoretical “Q” document (a theoretical source—along with the Gospel of Mark—for the Gospels of Matthew and Luke) has possibly been discovered. Not only that, but there's a lot of speculation that something big has been discovered in the text itself that wasn't used by Matthew or Luke and may shake the foundation of religious groups around the world.
It's been some time since the document was discovered, but now it's been translated and decoded. The contents are set to be revealed to the world, and on the verge of that, there's been a rash of mass suicides throughout the world by Christian-ish groups.
Teagarden's barely gotten involved when his group in Israel are attacked and he goes on the run, trying to get safely to Germany in time for the conference that will feature the unveiling of this document that may be Q.
Will he make it? Will he be able to bring the truths hidden for millennia to light? Are there truths contained at all? These questions and more are dealt with alongside the thrill-ride.
Yeah, that's a little longer than I usually spend on these sections, but it's that kind of plot.
WHAT PARTS REALLY WORKED FOR ME?
There's a lot about this book to commend—for starters, the way that it talks about the “legend” around Teagarden following the events of Flight of the Fox. It felt very real, very authentic—he's a folk hero to some and a folk villain to others.
Also, there's the tech from 2025—there's just a lot of little touches to make the world feel slightly advanced—and slightly annoying. Authentically so, I should add. There are some cool moves forward in technology, and they come with costs to things like privacy. There's a great temptation to ignore everything else about the book and do a deep dive on this stuff—missing the forest for a few trees, but Basnight did a good enough job with these trees that it'd be fun.
The best part of this book is watching Teagarden at work—instead of making his way down the Eastern seaboard in the States, he's making his way north from Israel through Italy to Germany. An older math professor, not in the best of health, is just fun to watch in this kind of role. There are a handful of times when it's not him running, it's Teagarden going toe-to-toe with someone set on doing him harm, too. I loved them all, his approach (and the way Basnight depicts this approach) are some of the most entertaining passages I've read in thrillers this year.
WHAT DIDN'T WORK FOR ME?]
Everything to do with the Q document and the reactions of various Christian groups, cults, and others to it. I'd have to get into details that are both spoilerific and too detailed for a post like this to adequately describe my problems. But I don't see a cult caring about the results of textual examination from something found in an archeological dig from Israel. I'm not that sure that a Pentecostal Snake Handling group is going to care that much, either. Nor do I see other Christian groups being driven to suicide because of the initial results of a translation from a very disputed text.
I know people who engage in Biblical textual criticism, and I've read a little bit on the serious end of popular works on the subject, and I'm sorry, it just doesn't work this way. It's not the kind of field where a bombshell discovery is going to come to light and the entire discipline is instantly changed. It's going to be debated, dissected, wrangled with, and then maybe, things will shift*. I get that it's fiction, but I just couldn't swallow any of this as hard as I tried.
* This assumes that something like Basnight's Q Document actually exists (or that the actual Q exists and says something like his)
THE BIG THEME
The one part of the religious aspect of the book that appealed to me was the discussion of faith, of devotion, of commitment on the part of both the religious and the anti-religious (the non-religious among humanity didn't really factor into things, this was a pro vs. con kind of thing). There's a group at work in this novel with the aim of eliminating all religion, all theism, throughout the world—and they are devout. Seriously devout. Contrasting these “true believers” with ardent religious people is striking, and deserves some thought. It reminded me of the article “Atheists Are Sometimes More Religious Than Christians” from The Atlantic a couple of years ago, but coming at it from a different angle.
SO, WHAT DID I THINK ABOUT MADNESS OF THE Q AS A WHOLE?
I'm really not sure what to say here. I thought about this a lot while I read it, and have thought about it a lot since I finished—both the details and the themes. And I'm still not sure. I dug the thriller aspects of it, the tech, the character of Sam Teagarden and when the book leaned into those aspects, I was happy. When the foundation—Q and the groups wanting to use the document for their own ends (or those despairing what they thought it might way)—was the focus, I had a hard time pushing on.
I liked (and gave 4 Stars to) the previous Sam Teagarden book. I would absolutely read a third novel featuring him (but I might hesitate if it seems to be in a Robert Langdon-ish vein again). But I just don't know what to say about this one. It's going to stay with me longer than books I've been very positive about this year—it's definitely stayed with me longer than books I didn't like this year. But I'm not sure I can give it a recommendation or a pan. I don't like just giving a shrug when trying to say what I think about a book, but I think that's where I am.
Disclaimer: I received a copy of this novel from the author in exchange for my honest opinion and this post.
