Oracle Bones
2006 • 512 pages

Ratings5

Average rating4.6

15
Daren
DarenSupporter

Oracle Bones is the second in Peter Hessler's China trilogy, and is quite a different book from his first. Hessler has moved on from being a Peace Corps English teacher in Fuling, and has stepped into a journalism role in Beijing. He is primarily freelance, but becomes the New York Person for The New Yorker part way through the book.

So starting with the negatives. The copy I have has ridiculously small font. I found it really hard to read for a long time, which meant I read this book in smaller doses than I would normally have - I think I might have read 3 or 4 books between starting and finishing this one (it took me a month to read, which is rare for me). It is also a dense book, which requires some consideration and thinking through.

This book covers a lot of ground, and contains a web of stories which weave throughout the book. It covers a lot of history, historical events and historical figures. It also features many of Hessler's former students, who area spread out in various parts of China. The other primary character is Polat, a Uighur from Xinjiang who Hessler befriends. Polat is a black market money changer who emigrates to the USA, setting up an opportunity for Hessler to write about the process and then his progress in the USA, where the author visits fairly regularly.

While I found Hessler's River Town very readable, engaging, fairly light and amusing, Oracle Bones was a more complex book to read. It still has some of the light and amusing, but a far less proportion, which is balanced with the more academic storyline about the oracle bones (an early form of written information carved into ox scapula bones, used for divining answers to important questions for the royal family) and oracle bone scholars. This had the effect of making the book much less intimate that his first book, but gives views of China from lots of perspectives, which is clever. However I can't help but wonder if this was 3/4 or 1/3 of the length, if I wouldn't have enjoyed it more (or perhaps even if the font size was increased!)

I have prevaricated over the star rating for this book. It has its pro's and con's and I have settled on 4 stars, which is the same as his earlier book, despite how they differ.

September 18, 2021Report this review