20 Years of the Year's Best Science Fiction
2 stars Metaphorosis Reviews
Summary
Gardner Dozois' favorite stories from 20 years of his Year's Best Science Fiction anthologies.
Review
Subtitled 20 Years of the Year's Best Science Fiction, the volume gives you a feeling for just how long Dozois had been doing this. And then realize there's also a later Very Best of the Best: 35 Years of the Year's Best Science Fiction. Impressive.
I've read several of Dozois' Year's Best over the years, most recently this one. I've never really cared for them much, and I've generally put it down to an off year, though with the suspicion that perhaps Dozois and I didn't agree. Having now read this volume – his best of the best – I can now definitively confirm the latter. While acknowledging that Dozois was a much-respected master anthologist in the field, I just don't like his taste.
Very few of these stories appealed to me, despite including at least some authors (such as Ursula Le Guin and Brian Stableford) that I generally enjoy. If this was a summary of 20 years of SF, the field was in a dire state during those years. I found the stories, as a rule, on the dull side, and it's not because I require fast-moving action and adventure. It's just that these stories generally neither engaged nor moved me. The writing is technically sound – as it should be at this level – but I seldom found myself caring much about what happened.
The exceptions – the more interesting stories – were largely and happily packed toward the back of the book, when I was most tired of it and most wanting it to end. They weren't enough to lift the anthology into the realms of books I enjoyed, but they gave me just enough hope to push through. They included: