Ratings6
Average rating3.7
The place: central Florida. The situation: a sensational murder trial involving a rich, white teenage girl--a twin--on trial for the horrific murder of her toddler brother, and the sequestered jury deciding her fate. . Two of the jurors sequestered (she, Juror C-2; he, F-17), holed up at the Econo-Lodge off I-75. As the shocking and numbing details of the crime and its surrounding facts are revealed during a string of days and seemingly endless court hours, the nights, playing out in a series of court-financed meals Hannah and Graham fall into a furtive affair, keeping their oath, as jurors, never to discuss the trial. During deliberations the lovers learn they are on opposing sides of the case and realize that their fellow jurors are wise to their affair. After the trial's end, as Hannah returns home to her much older, now, suddenly, frail husband (they married when she was 24; he, 58) an exploding media fury involving the case catches them all up in a frenzy of public outrage at a jury that seems to have convicted the wrong twin, and a judge who has received an anonymous handwritten letter about a series of sexual encounters ("I feel it is my duty as a juror and a citizen to report that two of my fellow jurors had sexual contact on more than seven occasions during our nights at the motel..."), calling into question their respective verdicts, and announcing she is releasing the jurors' names to the media. Hannah's "one last dalliance before she is too old" takes on profoundly personal and moral consequences, as the novel moves to its affecting, powerful and surprising conclusion.
Reviews with the most likes.
Ciment divides this book into two parts, the first starting with jury selection and ending with the verdict, and the second dealing with the aftermath of the trial. I thought that the first part was all-around excellent; highlights included the case itself, the feeling of constriction accompanying the sequestration of the jury, and the maintained anonymity of the jurors, with the author referring to them only by letter and number.
The second part of the book, in which the protagonist faces the fallout of her decisions, both her affair and her conduct as a juror, was quite sad, and initially led me to rate the book four stars. After sitting with the ending for a while (I'm writing this review approximately three weeks after finishing the book), my initial feelings have mellowed and I've come to really appreciate the latter half of the novel. In this section, the anonymity the protagonist relished in the first part is dramatically obliterated at great cost to her, her lover, her husband, and the accused whose fate she determined.
Despite the fact that it takes place in Florida, this is not a feel good summer read. Nevertheless, I would highly recommend it.