Reviews with the most likes.
Excerpt: Part of what makes this book less compelling is its lack of unity of purpose. There are chapters focused on debunking attacks from religionists and theologians, then sections summarizing some of the more influential religious and philosophical movements, all peppered with a surprising amount of synopses of his previous works as well as other people's. Though when tackling a subject, Stenger can be refreshingly succinct and sharp, the book as an experience lacks a flow that leads the reader anywhere in particular. Stenger also makes an odd habit of insinuating his own works into the existing New Atheist pantheon (pardon the term)–while I have no quibbles with him being considered a “Fifth Horseman,” it was a little uncomfortable to read several times that he seemed to think that anyone else thought him so. This is not in any way to denigrate the value of his work and contributions, but merely a comment on his choice to write about them in this particular manner. Also somewhat jarring is Stenger's fairly awkward use of more colloquial language that often seems to come from nowhere, and feel out of place in the context of the grand ideas being discussed.
For the full review, visit my column at http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-4275-Secularism-Examiner~y2010m1d15-Book-Review-Stengers-New-Atheism–Uneven-but-uncompromising#
