Ratings1
Average rating4
"Preeminent Shakespeare scholar James Shapiro shows how the tumultuous events in England in 1606 affected Shakespeare and shaped the three great tragedies he wrote that year--King Lear, Macbeth, and Antony and Cleopatra. In the years leading up to 1606, since the death of Queen Elizabeth and the arrival in England of her successor, King James of Scotland, Shakespeare's great productivity had ebbed, and it may have seemed to some that his prolific genius was a thing of the past. But that year, at age forty-two, he found his footing again, finishing a play he had begun the previous autumn--King Lear--then writing two other great tragedies, Macbeth and Antony and Cleopatra. It was a memorable year in England as well--and a grim one, in the aftermath of a terrorist plot conceived by a small group of Catholic gentry that had been uncovered at the last hour. The foiled Gunpowder Plot would have blown up the king and royal family along with the nation's political and religious leadership. The aborted plot renewed anti-Catholic sentiment and laid bare divisions in the kingdom. It was against this background that Shakespeare finished Lear, a play about a divided kingdom, then wrote a tragedy that turned on the murder of a Scottish king, Macbeth. He ended this astonishing year with a third masterpiece no less steeped in current events and concerns: Antony and Cleopatra. The Year of Lear sheds light on these three great tragedies by placing them in the context of their times, while also allowing us greater insight into how Shakespeare was personally touched by such events as a terrible outbreak of plague and growing religious divisions. For anyone interested in Shakespeare, this is an indispensable book"--
"Pre-eminent Shakespeare scholar James Shapiro shows how the tumultuous events in England in 1606 affected Shakespeare and influenced three of his greatest tragedies written that year - King Lear, Macbeth, and Antony and Cleopatra"--
Reviews with the most likes.
Reviews and more on my blog: Entering the Enchanted Castle
Very interesting survey of a year of turmoil and conflict in English history, following the Gunpowder Plot. I found it very illuminating to place Shakespeare's plays within their social and historical context. It also gives a glimpse of how historians come up with some of their ideas based on fragmentary evidence. Though Shapiro identifies three plays, King Lear, Macbeth, and Antony and Cleopatra, as being produced in 1606, only the first is fairly certain (that's why the book is called “The Year of Lear”). He makes a good case for the others, but this and many other statements should be taken for what they are: theories. There is also a fair amount of speculation, of the “Did Shakespeare feel this or that at the time? We can't know for certain” variety. Overall, it's like a tapestry with huge holes that has been filled in – convincingly, and helping us to see the big picture that otherwise would be hard to imagine, but keep in mind that it may not fully match the original.