Twice Lost

Review to come once I've thought about it more. Rounding up to four stars at the moment, though we'll see. Hmm.

Alright. This was fine. I'll keep it at four stars because I would recommend it. I feel like this book just suffers because I'm reading it sixty years after it was published. Some old books suffer because newer books or movies have done the same/similar premise and so feel... less inventive as a result. This isn't a bad book at all. Some of the writing is gorgeous. It just fell a bit flat because I felt a bit like I knew it already.