Adam Shields

Summary: The previous case continues to unfold

I am a long term fan of the series. Most of the books I have read more than once. But starting at about the eighth book there has been a shift from a mystery series to a thriller series. There are some books in the last dozen that have had more mystery elements than thriller elements, but most of those books have shifted from mysteries where Gamache and those around him follow clues and psychologically gain an understanding of the perpetrator, to thriller elements where the point is unfolding tension. Along with that thriller element, a natrual shift has been to make Gamache more and more of a traditional hero.

Part of what I loved is that the early books portrayed Gamache is using his brain, his love of others, the empathy he gained from his own tragic history and his experience with previous cases to solve crimes. But a lot of the recent stories have been focused on action hero tropes, luck, or the willingness of Gamache to bend the rules to stop others who have no regard for the rules. I am glad for series like this to grapple with the moral complexities of any job. And police work has plenty of moral complexities. And this series has grappled with the ways that bending rules because you think you are in the right can lead to bending rules because the rules are getting in your way. One of the things that gets tedious in John le Carré's books is that there are often no characters that are actually doing the right thing for the right reasons. It is all about power. There may be some realitiy to that, but it doesn't make for very compelling reading.

As the Gamache books have become more about conspiracy theories and less about crime, they fall into the trap of needing to be larger and larger conspiracies. This is a spoiler, but there is an author's note at the beginning that hints at the spoiler because the book was written prior to the most recent US Presidental election even if it wasn't published until Oct 2025. Early in Trump's presidency there was a lot of language about Canada becoming the 51st state of the US. The story here is about a conspiracy to invade Canada, or maybe a conspiracy to invade the US by Canada. Or maybe all of that is a ruse for other purposes. At times this feels a bit too "ripped from the headlines."

As it is, I think it is a fine thriller. It is really the second part of a two book arc, and I am not convinced that there won't be a third book in the arc. But even if it is a fine thriller, much of the elments of the series that I love, the people, the character development, the complex portayals of characters that I have grown to love are missing. While Jean-Guy Beauvoir and Isabelle Lacoste are all throughout the book, they feel more cardboard than normal. They have become arms of Gamache more than indpendent characters.

I will keep reading Louise Penny, but I do wish she would return to the smaller, cozy style that was the reason I started reading her.

This was originally posted on my blog at https://bookwi.se/black-wolf/

Short Review: - A very different vampire novel. The novel opens with a very young vampire that has been seriously injured and has no memory. These vampires are not changed humans but an entirely different species. The best part of the novel is the discovery of the new culture and rules of the this vampire world. In many ways it feels like a set up to a series, but Butler passed away a year after the novel was published.

The full review is on my blog at http://bookwi.se/fledgling/

Short Review: Books like this remind me of the importance of good history. The thesis is that the upheavals of the 1960s were predicted by the cracks in the foundation of American cultural hegemony. The intellectuals of the 1950s were transitioning into a post-modern world (which has taken 50 years to really filter down to culture). That transition prevented the intellectuals from charting a focused common path for the United States which a culture of progress wanted from the cultural elite. So the cracks in the White Protestant cultural dominance started which led to the more radical breakdowns of culture in the 1960s and 1970s.


My full review is on my blog at http://bookwi.se/twilight-of-american-enlightenment/

Summary: A biography of the great Octavia Butler, but mostly focusing on her work more than her life.

I knew about Octavia Butler long before I read her. Around 2006 or 2007 I read the twilight books. I enjoyed them enough that I read the original Dracula and then I picked up Fledgling, Octavia Butler's last book, which was also a type of vampire story.

That led me to reading Kindred and then the Patternist series and then the Xenogenesis series and the Parable of the Sower and the short story collection. I still have not read the Parable of the Talents because I think that other than the book from the Patternist series that Butler worked to take out of print because she didn't like it, that is the last of her books that I have not read and I am reluctant to read it because of that.

I did not really know anything about Butler prior to Positive Obsession. Butler grew up in post WWII California. I knew that she started writing in part because she saw a really bad scifi movie as a pre-teen and thought she could do better. I knew that she struggled to sell books and worked to support herself by doing temp jobs so she could write for much of her career. And I knew she died too young. (I wish there was more about her death. It is definitely hinted at, that she died in part because of bad medical care and maybe more can't be written about that beyond that speculation, but I wanted more.)

Positive Obsession did fill in more of her story. The author, Susana Morris, identifies Butler as autistic. I learned more about her background and a lot about the books she wrote. But as a biography, I thought Positive Obsession wasn't as good as I wanted it to be. It wasn't badly written. If you see it on sale (right now it is $1.99 on kindle) I think it is worth reading. But I think it is more about her books than about Butler. The author had access to Butler's diaries and interviewed many. But there doesn't seem to be much about her and her life.

The book did make me want to reread all of her writing again. And I think I will do that eventually. I am a bit uncomfortable with the use of sex in many of the books. The Patternist and Xenogenesis series involve generational breeding programs. Rape and coerced sex is part of many of the books. I use coerced sex in addition to rape because even when "voluntary", it isn't always freely chosen or at least not always free to leave. (As one example in Fledgling, the vampire creates an addictive relationship to the harem that they create around themselves so that the vampire takes blood from the group of humans they draw around them, and in return the humans get an extended life and very pleasurable sex, but can't leave.)

Butler is writing novels, but also social commentary. Her characters are complex and messy. Issues of gender and race and class are essential components of her writing. I did learn things her about the books that will make rereading the books more meaningful. As much as I wanted Positive Obsession to be a bit better, it did make me want to read Butler again and I think I will get more out of it as a result of reading it. So the main purpose of the book has been met.

It is not very long, and if you can pick it up on sale, that makes it even easier to recommend.

This was originally published on my blog at https://bookwi.se/positive-obsession/

Summary: The first definitive style biography of King in nearly 40 years.

At the end of the audiobook is an interview with Jonathan Eig and Lerone A. Martin, author of The Gospel of J Edgar Hoover. Their discussion about the lack of full biographies and the new sources is compelling. I had not realized that it has been over 40 years since Stephen Oates biography and nearly 40 years since Garrow's biography. Because I have read more recent books like The Seminarian and the The Sword and the Shield (joint biography of King and Malcolm X) as well as a number of histories were King played a major role in just didn't realize until I heard that interview how long it had been since a full biography.

Also detailed in that interview is new sources have been found or released. Eig is a journalist by training and history. You can tell that in his writing, but we are at that transition period when the Civil Rights generation is passing away. Eig says he was able to interview over 200 people who knew King. Some like Juanita Abernathy knew King well and were known figures. But Eig also interviewed minor figures, like his barber in Montgomery.

I am letting that interview at the end frame some of my thinking about the book, but it was clear from the start of the biography that Eig was trying to portray King as a flawed man. Similar to Alter's framing of Jimmy Carter, Eig has significant respect for King as a subject, but to write well about the whole man we do need to understand his weaknesses. I am going to talk more below about how he handles those weaknesses, but in that interview he said he wanted to keep King from being reduced and simplified.

One last point from the interview is that one of the significant sources that is fairly new are FBI files. Not all files have been declassified yet, but some have. Another set was declassified after the book was released. And another large set it scheduled to be released in 2027. Eig has no doubt about King's involvement in extramarital affairs. But he balances that with a more clear understanding of how J Edgar Hoover and the FBI as a whole were not just observers of affairs, but significant opponents of not just the civil rights movement in general but King in particular. The antagonism of the FBI and Hoover in particular was a significant part of how the shift in attitude toward both King and the civil rights movement. It was not just the point when King voiced opposition to the Vietnam war, but throughout the whole movement the FBI was acting as a propaganda machine against the civil rights movement, not just with the public but especially in harming the relationship that King had with the President and the Department of Justice. The affairs were one excuse, but not the first excuse or the main excuse for why the civil rights movement and King in particular were dangerous. The very next day after the 1963 March on Washington, the FBI puts out a memo labeling King as the greatest threat to American democracy. Hoover, as detailed in Lerone Martin's book was a Christian Nationalist with strong views of white racial superiority. He both viewed the civil rights movement as a communist plant or distraction, but also a violation of the natural order.

After King's assassination, COINTELPRO became better known for its work at undermining the civil rights movement with informants and plants and work to internally weaken civil rights organization including threats against funders, but the formal work of COINTELPRO was in existence by 1956. The "anonymous" letter encouraging King to commit suicide is well known, but less well know is how much effort the FBI put into seeding false or misleading stories into he press about Civil Rights leaders (including King) and working to undermine financial support of the movement. I suspect that as much as we know and is detailed here in Eig's book, more will be revealed in upcoming document releases.

Part of what I think is handled well by Eig is King's limitations. Everyone has a limited capacity (no one can do it all or be all things). King was empathetic, a great orator and deeply interested in his faith and justice. But he wasn't a grass roots organizer like Ella Baker or a theoretical philosopher of race and justice. His orientation to avoid interpersonal conflict meant that personal negotiation with political or business opponents to integration had a different private and public mode. But more importantly, his lack of balancing factors in his life meant that he was always traveling and following the action, not focused on proactive work. (Again, this was influenced by the FBI's work to interrupt funding.) The effort of keeping SCLC funded and running was left him unable to be with people in more grassroots ways that kept him energized. King was pushed into a role of icon at a very young age, which asked him to be all things in a way that no human could have.

There is a very good discussion about the 1965-1968 era and the ways that the Civil Rights movements began to break apart. That has of course been discussed widely in many different ways. Part of the traditional discussion is the slowness of change. Brown v Board and Montgomery happened in 1954, but laws around housing segregation, the biggest factor in school segregation in metro urban areas was not passed until 1968. The Cold War, one of the background factors in propelling civil rights forward crashed into Vietnam protests, which lowered the pressure on federal officials to respond to global interests. The slowing of US economic growth in the mid 1960s which moved to rapid inflation and recession in the 1970s and 80s allowed politicians and business leaders to scapegoat civil rights, affirmative action and welfare programs instead of globalization and aging business infrastructure. Many discussion about the breakup of the civil rights movement is about the movement stripped of the larger context of history. I think Eig could have included more about the broader context, but he included more about the context than what I have seen in other presentations.

As I was reading Eig's book I started reading an advance copy of Malcolm Foley's Anti-Greed Gospel. Foley is presenting a model of discussion of race centered on racial capitalism. Broadly, this can be thought of an a different mode of discussion based on racism as an economic reality similar to the way that Critical Race Theory is centered on racism as a legal reality. CRT I think has value in talking about how slow structural changes to US law and practice were. The fact that my kids today go to a school that is 90% racial minorities and 70% low income, when another school just a half mile away in the same district is 11% Black or Hispanic and 7% low income is a structural issues. But racial capitalism as an idea I think also speaks to that structural issue (resistance to changing school zoning because of its impact on housing prices) as well as the way that funding for the Civil Rights movement drying up exactly when it started to expand its target beyond voting rights. King always had a vision for the role of economics in racism, but many of the white participants in those movement did not fully embrace that. And the pragmatic supporters of desegregation who were more interested its impact on anti-communism efforts than on the way that the civil rights movement was connected to a global anti colonialism movement fell away when King started speaking about Vietnam.

No book is perfect, and it is difficult to present a figure like King well when so much of his story is fixed in the minds of most readers. But I think there is value in King: A Life not just because there is new data and that Eig spends a lot of time on Coretta in ways that some others do not (including being the first to write about personal letters between Coretta and Martin). Eig is a punchy writer and the story moves along with force that is not always the case with long biographies. Obviously, this is a book that won a Pulitzer Prize, so it does not need my stamp of approval. About halfway through the book I was not sure there was much different form Oates biography and other shorter versions of King that I had read, but I think the second half of the book showed why this biography has been so well received.

This was originally posted on my blog at https://bookwi.se/king/