I was hesitating between 2 and 3 stars, but my husband reminded me that I'd been complaining about this book nonstop for two weeks. Good idea, bad execution. It could have been much better, if only the author had had an editor.

Technically, I dnf-ed this book after first two chapters. Marking it here, so that future me doesn't make a mistake of trying to read it again. The plot may be interesting, but the “whimsical” writing style just wasn't for me.

Whatever the second book is about that part of the story must have been included into this novel. Too long and repetitive, and the big “reveals” were predictable and a bit nonsensical. 1 star out of 2 for the dogs.

An epitome of “show, don't tell”. As much as the other six books were fun page-turners, this one felt like a monotonous slog to get through.

It's all very dramatic (and almost true to the facts).

I listened to the audiobook and really liked it as a travelogue. It's a bit all over the place and the author wasn't entirely without a bias, but for someone (like myself) who hasn't been in any of those countries and who's not that well familiar with their history, it can be a nice starting point.

It was odd, and not too funny, and a perfect comfort book. I loved every page of it and, writing this review, I already want to reread it.

Too much romance, not enough logic.

An unusual book about an unusual hobby. It's full of interesting ideas and observations to think about, and I'll very likely reread it.

3,5 stars out of 5. Whenever the story leans too much on the chosen one tropes, it becomes a bit less exciting. But the art, as always, is amazing.

4/5. Beautiful art, interesting story, occasionally funny.
I finally read fandom wiki and understand now who is who and who is against whom.

В точности что обещано на обложке, то и в книге. Хорошее введение для тех, кто (как и я) ничего не понимает в христианском искусстве, и хочет начать с более общего обзора тем.

I don't want to speak harshly about this novel, because it appears to be heavily inspired by events from the author's childhood and adult life (she mentions so in the afterword). It's not a well-written book, and it might have been better as a short story.

This book could have been a much shorter essay. But it would be an interesting essay with some nice advice, and there is something pleasant (although a bit sad) in feeling seen and confirming once again that many people have the same problems.

I liked the cyclic-ish structure of the plot, but in many respects it blends together the common dystopian tropes and themes that others have done better. Plus there's an r-scene. Is it necessary to the story? No. Is it disturbing and poorly aged? Very much so.