Matt Inman
They are strangely addictive and fun. Following the challenges of Carl and his ex's sentient cat through an 18-level dungeon that would prefer to have them dead.
They are strangely addictive and fun. Following the challenges of Carl and his ex's sentient cat through an 18-level dungeon that would prefer to have them dead.
They are strangely addictive and fun. Following the challenges of Carl and his ex's sentient cat through an 18-level dungeon that would prefer to have them dead.
They are strangely addictive and fun. Following the challenges of Carl and his ex's sentient cat through an 18-level dungeon that would prefer to have them dead.
If you're a DCC fan, its more good fun. Advancing the story as Carl and Donut get through another floor in the Dungeon.
If you're a DCC fan, its more good fun. Advancing the story as Carl and Donut get through another floor in the Dungeon.
Not my cup of tea. Could get past the first couple chapters.
Not my cup of tea. Could get past the first couple chapters.
It's a Murderbot book, you should know what you're getting into by now if you have read the other books. Nothing new in this book, just good fun.
It's a Murderbot book, you should know what you're getting into by now if you have read the other books. Nothing new in this book, just good fun.
This intense manifesto serves as a chilling wake-up call regarding the alignment problem in Artificial Intelligence. The authors argue that creating a superintelligence is not like building a better computer, but rather like summoning a god that doesn't necessarily care about human survival.
The central thesis is terrifyingly simple: if we don't solve how to perfectly code human values into a machine before it becomes smarter than us, the first AGI created will likely "optimize" the world in a way that incidentally eliminates biological life. It’s a dense, high-stakes analysis that frames our current technological race as a potential "game over" scenario for the species.
This intense manifesto serves as a chilling wake-up call regarding the alignment problem in Artificial Intelligence. The authors argue that creating a superintelligence is not like building a better computer, but rather like summoning a god that doesn't necessarily care about human survival.
The central thesis is terrifyingly simple: if we don't solve how to perfectly code human values into a machine before it becomes smarter than us, the first AGI created will likely "optimize" the world in a way that incidentally eliminates biological life. It’s a dense, high-stakes analysis that frames our current technological race as a potential "game over" scenario for the species.
I see and understand the hype of this book, but after reading almost 1/2 of it I'm not sure how much more I can get out of it. I'm going to stop and move on. Take some lessons learned and apply them..or not.
I see and understand the hype of this book, but after reading almost 1/2 of it I'm not sure how much more I can get out of it. I'm going to stop and move on. Take some lessons learned and apply them..or not.