SamKirkby

A good book which gives an alternative view to how we view ancient history, comparing and contrasting the ancient Mediterranean and ancient eastern Asia. Michael Scott has clearly attempted a mammoth task in trying to give a general overview of Armenian, Roman, Greek, Chinese, Indian and Central Asian history and in my personal opinion in order to achieve such a task the book needs to be a lot longer. I found it difficult to read at times, this is not due to bad writing, it is just merely because I found some topics quite tedious. I do however find it impressive how Michael managed to compress all of this history into 360 pages, one can assume that you could write 2000 pages on this topic and still not fully get your point across. After reading some other reviews one individual makes a great point, by skimming over histories such as Chinese and Indian the only histories where you can really gauge a true understanding are the ones most europeans already know about such as Greek and Roman, this contradicts the whole purpose of the book which is more or less to say “what about other ancient histories?”.