Suarez is a terrific writer who takes a science/computer idea/trend and stretches it to the max. In this case, drones. Lots of action and scary plausibility. Recommended.

I really wanted to like this book, but the greatest drawback was the writing. Lots of unreferenced pronouns (eg, “he said it to him”), lack of context and background, jumps in time that are not pointed out and much more. I realize that this is a difficult book to write with a huge cast of characters and she does tell the story of Madison, but not in a very interesting way.

The clearest exposition of the Banach-Tarski I've ever seen. Come to think of it, the only exposition of the Banach-Tarski paradox I've ever seen. Not so hard mathematics that prove you can disassemble a pea into 5 or more pieces and reassemble them into a sphere the size of the sun.

Dennis Prager makes the argument that out of three value systems - Leftism, Islamism and Americanism - only the last holds the hope for the future of the world.

The collection consists of 4 books: two books of short stories and the other two complete books. Republished by the deceased author's son. I last read this 45 years ago and it holds up really well. Lots of fun for science kids.

The history of tchelet, the blue thread in tzitzit, with many sidelines.

Hammett doesn't hold a candle to Chandler. Ho hum book.

I disliked this book in so many ways:
1) It's a proctologist's view of Israel
2) the writing is overwrought and repetitive
3) I think the history is wrong in many places
4) How much can one author write about himself?
5) I disagree with the author's leftist politics (although, to his credit, he never pretends otherwise)

Not the best Christie - quite repetitive and Miss Marple is so old. Not much of a puzzle either.

1100 pages of classic Michener. As with most of his books, the last chapter, set in modern times (1985 in this case), is somewhat weaker than the others.

Fun romp through the history of the neutrino. I didn't know that the missing solar neutrino problem had been solved.

The sequel to the first book, Daemon. Full of interesting and scary ideas of a future society based on computers.

Early Bryson - somewhat crude but often laugh out loud funny.

I really wanted to like this book as I am a big fan of Menachem Begin. Unfortunately, it is a poorly written effort. The author repeats himself endlessly; for example, we are told at least a half a dozen times that Begin is “inching” towards being Prime Minister. he also hagiographically repeats every few paragraphs that Begin is an honorable, traditional old-world Jew. Most disappointing is that there is very little personal detail on Begin. Avoid this book.

Very interesting techno-thriller that gets the computer stuff correct.

A childishly written book, with frequent personal anecdotes by the authors to make larger economic points. They constantly prate on about “field experiments”; what other kinds are there? They also toe the liberal line from A to Z when they are supposed to be running scientific experiments. Not recommended.

Amusing but uneven book about culture and the Presidents. I mostly enjoyed learning what the various Presidents read. One jarring note was bad production design - about every other page had a cutout box repeating some of the text on that page. They probably could have reduced the book by a sixth by removing them.

The theory of general relativity has gone from revolutionary to almost ignored to hot again over the last 100 years. This is a difficult kind of book to write - too much detail and no one will understand it, too little and the whole enterprise is abstract and vague. On a 1 to 10 scale, with 10 being too technical, the author achieves about a 7.

Bill Bryson cannot write a bad book. Here he chronicles one summer in 1927 in America, with a cast of dozens: Charles Lindbergh, Babe Ruth, Herbert Hoover, Prohibition, Mississippi Floods, Lou Gehrig, Calvin Coolidge, Al Capone and many more. An excellent way to learn history.

Plot is somewhat muddled.

Standard legal thriller

This was a dreadful book. I thought The Great Santini and The Lords of Discipline were two of the best novels I had ever read (not that I read a lot of novels), but now I wonder if Pat Conroy is even sane. Every major character in this book is just a mess. Everyone is saintly, evil, preening, cruel, funny, mean, proud and insane. The author comes across as a jerk. Skip it.

I picked this up because I'm a big Zev Chafets fan. I knew nothing about Roger Ailes. To my surprise, I really enjoyed this book. Ailes is an interesting guy.

Workmanlike biography of one of my favorite authors. Very little drama and not too much insight, although I don't think there is too much insight needed.