Reminds me of Hitchhiker's Guide; narrator and many, lengthy, humorous descriptions. That can be nice at times but not at the moment.

Too much like the first book, which I wanted to enjoy but didn't.

Alot of detail to this story which makes keeping track of who is associated with who, and their philosophies and disagreements difficult. As well as across time. Glad I got to read about a good person in an area where we think there are none.

Couldn't get interested in fictional, or maybe not, history of Quebec area. Enjoyed seeing bits and pieces of my high school French lessons are still in the brain.

About the time the story got started, it came to a sudden stop.

Reminds me a lot of Janet Evonovich's Stephanie Plum series. I think the narrator is the same.

I enjoyed getting an understanding of why different issues made it to my ears, what made a term go smoothly or not, and I was especially glad to hear the book was written recent enough to get some insights on Trump's early days.

Nothing wrong with the story telling just not a good fit for me.

The pace of the final battle and aftermath were nicely done. The two narrators did a great job relaying the emotions of their characters as well.

I grew up with ‘women are weak' and ‘women should not be put in harm's way' and I don't like other people making my decisions for me. I'm glad to hear the Army has moved forward with gender blindness and glad to be introduced to the women who took the leap and paved the way.

I like this female perspective better than the Avalon series I've read; strong rather than bitter.

A little too detailed but still a good read.

I'd always assumed bullfighters were male and was glad to read a well-written auto biography of a successful female in the industry.