I don't know, Tally seemed really passive in this one, for all the running around and fighting that happens. I was really uncomfortable with the cutting, and the semi-glamorization of it (thought this isn't something I have a background in). Also, Tally's decision in the end disappointed me, both who she went with and where she went.
I really liked this – I've read the whole series before, but I started a reread and now feel compelled to finish it. Two things about the end (and therefore spoilers): 1) I really like that Tally was gonna go with Zane over David, because I get tired of the first boy in a YA book being the main character's One Twoo Love. 2) It was really unfair of Maddy to blame Tally for Zane's brain damage. Like, if the pills had to be taken together, maybe you should PUT THAT IN THE DIRECTIONS. Even a pretty could understand that.
I love Jane Austen and all, but this one is just kind of weird. I don't really care for any of the characters; the Crawfords are entirely unsuitable, considering what happens (kind of abruptly) in the last few chapters, but at least they have some personality. I don't know if Edmund is meant to be Mr. Collins Light, but he really is. Also, he and Fanny are cousins, which is still pretty gross.
I want to reread this already. I loved the stories in two timelines (which makes it sound like Lost, but I can't think of a better way to put it, and I REALLY loved the Griggs/Taylor relationship (and all of Taylor's friends, really, especially Raffy). This book wasn't at all what I was expecting from the blurb, which is good, because it's so much better.
I liked this, but I don't know if I'll reread, which is usually the sign of a book I really liked. I was glad that it was more about friendship and moving on than typical chicklit (which, fairly or not, I think is more about romantic relationships). The “derby = life” metaphor got a little overworked for me by the end, and some of the minor characters needed some more development, but overall, I'd recommend it.
Incredibly well-constructed. I always get really confused with time-travel plotlines, but this actually made perfect sense to me. I figured out who was doing the traveling pretty early on, but since I'm probably twice the age of the target audience, I shouldn't be too proud of that. Loved it, love all the Wrinkle in Time references, and yeah.
So, I'm assuming this is the second book of a trilogy, because this didn't resolve anything, it just ended. I liked most of the characters, just like I did in the first one, but I thought the Marlene arc came from nowhere and the entire book needed more Mrs. Amberson. (And less Eric, even though he was barely in it. Yes, I hold grudges against fictional characters.) Basically, I did like this, even though this review sounds pretty negative. I love most of the characters, but the plot needed some work.
Quick read, but a lot of fun. Don't know how it would go over with people who aren't Columbus fans, but luckily, I am. Wish the pictures had been in color and there had been a little more original material, since the majority of the book is reprints of columns published online during the season. Overall, though, I enjoyed this and it made me really hope MLS comes back on schedule.
Spoiler: Columbus wins!
I liked the narrator, but everything that the reviews on the first page say about the girl characters is true. Maybe I'm going easier on this book because I've read way more un-feminist YA books (I am still mad that I read [b:Cycler 2970898 Cycler Lauren McLaughlin http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1255632240s/2970898.jpg 3001136], yes). I enjoyed this, though, and I can see this book being a jumping-off point for readers to find the music and books that are mentioned in it. I don't know if I'll re-read or not, but it was worth the time.Random side note: this was published in 2006, but no one has a cell phone?
I liked this, though I don't know if it'll be a reread like [b:Prep 9844 Prep A Novel Curtis Sittenfeld http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1166071934s/9844.jpg 2317177] is for me. I like Alice as a character, and was able to separate her from Laura Bush, but Charlie was always George W. Bush no matter what, and I think my feelings about him got in the way of my being able to appreciate the actual character. Alice is essentially passive, which gets frustrating, but the book acknowledges that.
Not as good as [b:Suite Scarlett 2328841 Suite Scarlett Maureen Johnson http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1255725165s/2328841.jpg 2335405], but better than [b:Girl at Sea 357105 Girl at Sea Maureen Johnson http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174060733s/357105.jpg 1428079]. I do wish Ginny was more developed as a character beyond the whole envelope thing, but I overall liked this one.
I wanted to like this more than I did, but it suffered in comparison to Nick and Norah. The Ely/Bruce relationship is cute and sweet and the best part of this book, but I couldn't really relate to Naomi. The alternating narrators work well, though I wasn't sure about adding the third-party narrators (like Robin).
I wanted to rate this higher because it's such an interesting concept, but I can't in good faith, because the actual book is a total disappointment. It's essentialist, bi-phobic, and not even well-written (if I read “deeply” or “mal” one more time I was gonna throw something, and seriously, YA authors, stop trying to create your own slang – it didn't work for the Babysitters Club and it won't work for you). I wanted this book to be so much more than it was, but no one is really developed as a character (least of all the parents), and I didn't like any of the main characters enough to care what happened to them.
And for the record? 5'9” and 118 pounds is not “voluptuous” or whatever the narrator describes Ramie as. It is EMACIATED. It's an aside, but it bugged me for the rest of the book.
Maureen Johnson is hit or miss for me, but this was a definite hit, and my favorite book of hers. I like the setting and the family dynamic (and Scarlett's brother is a great character). I know there's a sequel coming out soon, and I'll definitely be reading it. Overall, nothing earth-shattering, but light and cute and a lot of fun.ETA: reread this February 2010 after reading [b:Scarlett Fever 6138539 Scarlett Fever Maureen Johnson http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1256408513s/6138539.jpg 6317320].