
Feminist horror seems to have common veins that I am not a fan of - a very damaged female protagonist who regains power after being abused in some way shape or form. The first couple of times had some variation, but I'm feeling the same problem with white male authors: the books are just very similar at the core.
Notable body horror here, and I really did like the folk horror components. If I hadn't just read The Madness, I would have probably loved this one.
The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness

Not bad for pop-sci, and definitely an important, if not seminal, topic. The central premise is one most likely agree on - except apparently other researchers. The book spends too much time fighting counter arguments. As an academic, I know we struggle with this, but just say "see my website with in depth evidence and counters to common arguments", and be done with it.
Definitely a white male dream. I, a white male Trekkie scientist, am arguably the ideal audience. I however found the book derivative at times and not really groundbreaking.
Overall, I understand why it's liked and loved, but it just didn't do it for me.
Full disclosure, I feel like a snob writing bad reviews, but, if you didn't like this book, you're not alone.
Probably the first utterly disappointing book I read. Also uniquely one where the adaptation is phenomenally better.
I didn't need to read all the weird indigenous fetishization... Notably lazy writing at several parts. Just, wow.
Give the show a try. It solved literally everything I hated about the novel.
This being said, I do think it's important to read and recognize how older white male horror authors love to make women of color into a mix between sex symbols and shamans. Richard Matheson definitely did it, for instance.
Some positives for The Terror? Honestly, no, not from me.
I was really disappointed by this one. I had hoped for more horror than was present, but that's not a cardinal sin. The hard thing to get past was the repetitive pattern that was at best preachy and at worst derivative.
Overall, sort of weak character development in my opinion, but way less descriptive writing than I expected. This one just didn't click with me at all.
Some interesting components. Probably should have just been two books so that things weren't rushed at the end.
Overall, the writing isn't great. I laughed out loud more times than not when I'm supposed to be... Titillated? I was bummed that the author couldn't get all of the science correct (I was trained for research in parasitology), but worms are definitely having a moment...