Daniel
A decidedly subjective narrativization that turns history into an allegory for how established power structures might hinder progress, that’s open enough about the fact that it’s a story about history more than anything else to make it into an entertaining read full of anecdotes for the next party smalltalk and/or business pitch meeting.
A decidedly subjective narrativization that turns history into an allegory for how established power structures might hinder progress, that’s open enough about the fact that it’s a story about history more than anything else to make it into an entertaining read full of anecdotes for the next party smalltalk and/or business pitch meeting.
As much as this book is a retelling of the movie itself, you might get more out of it if you haven’t watched it (which you should because Showgirls, indeed, doesn’t suck).
As much as this book is a retelling of the movie itself, you might get more out of it if you haven’t watched it (which you should because Showgirls, indeed, doesn’t suck).
Every time the story goes beyond the fictional games as a reflection of the characters inner feelings it starts to drag, bordering on „hello fellow kids“-cringe with unneccecary (and implausible) references, which is a shame, because the rest of it is a fascinating examination of the complexity of relationships.
Every time the story goes beyond the fictional games as a reflection of the characters inner feelings it starts to drag, bordering on „hello fellow kids“-cringe with unneccecary (and implausible) references, which is a shame, because the rest of it is a fascinating examination of the complexity of relationships.