Drood
Ratings15
Average rating3.4
15
Ratings15
Average rating3.4
On June 9, 1865, while traveling by train to London with his secret mistress, 53-year-old Charles Dickens--at the height of his powers and popularity, the most famous and successful novelist in the world and perhaps in the history of the world--hurtled into a disaster that changed his life forever. Did Dickens begin living a dark double life after the accident? Were his nightly forays into the worst slums of London and his deepening obsession with corpses, crypts, murder, opium dens, the use of lime pits to dissolve bodies, and a hidden subterranean London mere research . . . or something more terrifying? Just as he did in [The Terror][1], Dan Simmons draws impeccably from history to create a gloriously engaging and terrifying narrative. Based on the historical details of Charles Dickens's life and narrated by Wilkie Collins (Dickens's friend, frequent collaborator, and Salieri-style secret rival), Drood explores the still-unsolved mysteries of the famous author's last years and may provide the key to Dickens's final, unfinished work: [The Mystery of Edwin Drood][2]. Chilling, haunting, and utterly original, Drood is Dan Simmons at his powerful best.
[1]: http://openlibrary.org/works/OL1963316W/
[2]: http://openlibrary.org/works/OL14869990W/
Reviews with the most likes.
I truly enjoyed this gripping, chilling read. A smart blend of interesting historical fact and a well constructed mystery make Drood - not novels like The Da Vinci Code - a prime example of outstanding historical fiction.
Rather than spend pages talking about what I liked (which were numerous), allow me to be the critic and share the three points that kept me from giving this gem a full 5 stars.
1. At various points throughout the novel, Simmons goes a bit too far in his weaving of history into the plot. This practice normally serves a great purpose; however, when carried too long, it seems as though he is filling pages with long paragraphs of who-wrote-to-whom-in-which year.
2. Each time a puzzling moment came up in the book, Simmons did a great job in having Wilkie confirm my suspicion with some of his own. However, all too frequently, resolutions to those puzzles were never given, almost as if Simmons had forgotten to re-approach them.
3. The grandiose emotion of the book's plot, the sinister, ethereal, and extremely mysterious nature of its villain, and the ever-present sense of doom carry this book to an extreme height. However, this is often a tricky spot to land in, as only the most talented of authors can deliver a climax that stays that high. Drood's ending, while certainly brain-bending and interesting, doesn't carry the same level of excitement that it's plot does.
Overall, this is a book - and an author - not to be missed. Check it out as soon as you can.
Long, got a little weird to say the least, but a very good book if you have the time.
I am setting this aside for now, I am 250 pages in and finding it pretty boring, which is a bummer because the blurb made it sound so good...maybe I will pick it up again at a later date...
Good fun. Victorian London was appropriately stodgy and filthy, the Great Stink was mentioned, and my interest in Dickens and Collins was piqued. The mystery was delightful, although ambiguous at the end, which part of me always loves, despite the frustration. Immensely enjoyable, though not quite as good as my darling ‘The Terror,' where I had a crush on about three characters.
