ILLBORN

Okay so apparently Twitter is under the assumption this was in bad faith. I can understand thinking that due to the timing. However, I merely thought this book was just not good. Sorry for the pedestrian reason for giving something one star. I think it goes without saying that people shouldn't harass authors or, really, anybody, for their relatively mild actions. Also giving something a poor rating you havent read is stupid.

HOWEVER.

I originally read this book over a year ago and really did not like it. I try not to blast self-pub books that I don't like and it was earlier in my reviewing time where I was worried about the balance between constructive criticism and not, so I just elected to keep my thoughts to myself. Added to that, the author seemed like a friendly guy, and I had no desire to trash his book. In light of recent events, I just decided that if he didn't seem to respect the reviewer space in general, I would post my actual rating of the book. Seems fair. This was straightforward to me. I repeat: don't harass authors off of social media platforms. Also probably don't act petty when you get negative reviews. Probably there's a middle ground here somewhere.

Anyway I disliked this book for a lot of reasons. I thought the sentences were extremely awkward on almost every page. Word choices that didn't make a lot of sense and stilted dialogue. The worst example was when a father said “the fuck you will” to his son wanting to become a priest or something. It was just such an awkward, modern millenial-sounding thing to be saying in a medieval fantasy book. In general, I thought most of the dialogue was very average. Also it's important for context that I am not a prose snob, there are a lot of what I would describe as pedestrian writing styles that work perfectly fine for me. But the flow of this one felt very off for me personally.

I also thought the female characters were bad. This has been mentioned in other reviews, and I agree with them. One character has magical lust powers that she uses to rape men and it's not handled maturely enough, IMO, to not feel incredibly gross and weird. I think rightfully so if a male character had this power and plotline it would go very poorly. Then the other two female characters are just the nice girl who has never done anything wrong and then there's a disabled girl who exists just to love and support this barbarian guy. So generally this wasn't great.

But the other big issue I had was just that people kept saying this book was super unique and I do not understand where the unique parts come into play. There are chosen ones, there is Christianity but with a different name, it is medieval. There is tribal warfare. So I felt confused on why it was sold to me this way. Uniqueness is not a prerequisite for goodness; but the other aspects of the story weren't particularly interesting either. The characters all fell into archetypes and the worldbuilding was very basic; there are tribes warring, why? There's a religious organization that believes...what? There was just nothing exciting going on.

And I really tried. I DNF'd the book at 25% but I was determined to like it and came back and read until 50% mark and just felt utter despair the whole time. I did not like a single aspect of the book besides the prologue, which was excellent.

Anyway to sum up, this review is genuine, Twitter is a bad place, and magical lust storylines are weird. Thanks for attending my TED talk.