Ratings1
Average rating4
The book recounts a successful 3500 mile journey from Peking, China to Kashmir, India in 1935. He was accompanied on this journey by Ella Maillart (Kini). The journey started on 16 February 1935 and took seven months to complete. The objective of the journey was, as contained within the title of the book, to ascertain what was happening in Tunganistan, a region of Sinkiang (also known as Chinese Turkestan), in the aftermath of the Kumul Rebellion. Fleming met with Ma Shaowu and Ma Hushan while in Xinjiang.
Peter Fleming still ranks as a favorite writing traveler, but he slips a few cogs with this book, which follows conventional lines more closely (in matters of handling) than one has come to expect of his light-hearted writing. Central Asia is his stamping ground, with Peking as a starting point, with Sinkiang, Kashmir and all sorts of unspellable places en route. There is something of the troubled background of Chinese Turkistan, concretely and indirectly, something of the evasive situation in which neither China nor Russia quite comes to the fore. Rival correspondents, bent on the same game -- Peter Fleming and Ella Maillart (remember Turkistan Solo?) are virtually compelled to join forces, and shared the enormous difficulties and inconveniences and dangers (minimized as always by Fleming) of the seven months trek. Humor -- originality -- spirited story telling characterize this, but there isn't quite the sparkle of his earlier books.
Reviews with the most likes.
For those who aren't aware, [b:Forbidden Journey 20569925 Forbidden Journey Ella Maillart https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1439688906l/20569925.SY75.jpg 666936], by Ella Maillart and [b:News From Tartary 16078494 News From Tartary A Journey from Peking to Kashmir Peter Fleming https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1349868922l/16078494.SX50.jpg 543853] by Peter Fleming both describe the same journey, at the same time, taken together. They were somewhat reluctant companions, who both expressed their misgivings about undertaking the journey together. “The jokes were flying. Somebody observed that Peter's last book was called One's Company, and the English edition of my last book, was Turkestan Solo. Now here we were, contrary to all our principles, going off together!”In both Forbidden Journey and News From the Tartary the authors distance themselves from the greatness of their work. Fleming goes so far in his Foreword to say “Anyone familiar, even vicariously, with the regions which he traversed will recognise the inadequacy of my descriptions of them... we were no specialists. The world's stock of knowledge – geographical, ethnological, meteorological, what you will – gained nothing from our journey. Nor did we mean that it should. Much as we should have liked to justify our existence by bringing back material which would have set the hive of learned men buzzing... we were not qualified to do so. We measured no skulls, we took no readings; we would not have known how. We travelled for two reasons only... We wanted to find out what was happening in Sinkiang... the second... was because we believed, in the light of previous experience, that we should enjoy it. It turned out we were right. We enjoyed it very much.”Both these books were written in a fairy humble, self-deprecating way, something I hadn't expected from Fleming in particular. I had found his [b:One's Company: A Journey to China in 1933 4757144 One's Company A Journey to China in 1933 Peter Fleming https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1333995036l/4757144.SY75.jpg 1785653] written quite pretentiously, and I hadn't enjoyed it much at all. News from the Tartary however is not written this way at all.Both books come across as accurately written, where one omits detail the other picks detail up, but they don't contradict each other. It may be that one author takes more from one encounter, or one location than the other, or one author is more involved in the conversation with a certain person, and therefore finds more to describe. At times an even that might take a chapter to explain in one book is bypassed with a sentence in the other book. I don't think anything would be lost from reading only one or other of these books, but I enjoyed the novelty of reading them together .It is fair to say that the journey was not unique – it was not the first time this route had been followed, but it was the first time for a number of years, and it would be a number more before it was repeated. But to say that the journey of Maillart and Fleming was an inspiration for dozens of other intrepid travellers is no exaggeration.Great books. I have opted to review them together... mainly due to the fact I read them together and can't really separate them.