Roses for the Dead

This originally appeared at The Irresponsible Reader.

---

WHAT'S ROSES FOR THE DEAD ABOUT?

Seven years ago, Erika Piper is one of the detectives that arrested the rock star, Johnny Mayhem, for beating his wife to death with a baseball bat. It's not one of those cases that haunts her, they had solid evidence, made a good arrest, and moved on.

But now, new evidence has been made public that casts doubt on that arrest. Enough doubt that Mayhem is released. He's angry about the last seven years and the way "the real killer" got away with things, so he's making not very subtle threats against those who were involved in his arrest and conviction—and the man who held onto that evidence until now.

Under the shadow of Mayhem's release, Piper returns to work after maternity leave—to a nice, safe, and stultifyingly boring desk job. Which she's going to make work, she's committed to the idea—she regrets its necessity, but she wants to be a good mother, and she has plenty of evidence that the DI role is dangerous. But on her first day back—the new DCI offers her old DI position. She needs someone with the experience that only Piper has. Just mentioning the offer causes problems at home, her partner, Tom is dead set against it and makes that very clear. Eventually, she agrees—for one case, and then they'll re-evaluate.

That one case? The death of Mayhem's drug dealer—the man who held on to the evidence for all those years. There's evidence at the scene that ties it to the death of Mayhem's wife, too. Could this be her chance to redeem herself for the work on the original case?

THIS IS THE END?

At this point, the series feels lived in—we're comfortable with all of the characters and this world. If McDonald hadn't been making so much noise about returning to it lately, this is where I'd be complaining that he jumped off at the wrong time. We needed more time with Piper's new boss and partner, and that it'd be good to see Piper functioning in a stable environment for a bit (like she was in the beginning of Whispers). But since it looks like he's at least thinking of #4, I guess I can spare us all that.

SO, WHAT DID I THINK ABOUT ROSES FOR THE DEAD?

If I was ranking them, I'd put the second in the series, Whispers in the Dark, a little higher—and not just because of the shocking mid-book scene. But just a little—I'd have preferred a little more time spent with a couple of the threads in this book (and one more proofreading pass). Those are just quibbles, though. This is a gripping story and McDonald got me chasing a couple of red herrings—I was fully committed to one of them until the moment it became impossible.

I thought the conflict over Piper leaving the desk job for the DI role so soon was resolved a little too easily—but I do appreciate the way that McDonald handled it overall. I just wanted it fleshed out a little more, I think.

That's twice I've said something along the same lines in this section—essentially, I guess what I'm saying is that I liked the book, but it was a bit too lean. Several scenes were a bit too brief, conversations could've gone on a little longer—especially the arguments over Piper's work (and too often she and Tom are just repeating themselves). I'm not asking for another 100 pages, but maybe 20? This is the shortest of the three and it felt like it.

I cannot say enough for both the premise of Roses for the Dead and the resolution of that story. McDonald's take on this idea was fresh enough to make it stand out among other procedurals. Even if it feels impossible to talk about without spoiling just about everything. The pacing is strong, I can't get enough of these characters, and the investigation was well-executed—everything you want in a police procedural.

I'm glad I finally got to reading these books, and encourage crime readers out there to pick them up, too.