rambling: feels like a stream of consciousness thing rather than a structured & well-thought-out argument
- the content of the book hardly feels related to its content. Only talks about beliefs in the last 30 minutes of the book
- little practical/applicable insight to be derived from the book
- his assertions like genes don't impact on outcomes, but only on perceptions is rubbish (its not either/or, but both). He doesn't even make the obvious connection that beliefs influence perception