The Unabomber Manifesto: Industrial Society & Its Future
Ratings6
Average rating3.3
15
Ratings6
Average rating3.3
In 1971, Dr. Theodore Kaczynski rejected modern society and moved to a primitive cabin in the woods of Montana. There, he began building bombs, which he sent to professors and executives to express his disdain for modern society, and to work on his magnum opus, Industrial Society and Its Future, forever known to the world as the Unabomber Manifesto. Responsible for three deaths and more than twenty casualties over two decades, he was finally identified and apprehended when his brother recognized his writing style while reading the 'Unabomber Manifesto.' The piece, written under the pseudonym FC (Freedom Club) was published in the New York Times after his promise to cease the bombing if a major publication printed it in its entirety.
Reviews with the most likes.
Thought provoking book, altough there are some weird takes in it. It is still refreshing to read anti-industrial literature as it is uncommon.
Not so surprisingly this was pretty mad, I think I expected something a bit more clever regarding the aura pop culture set around Unabomber.
This was published in 1995 and while it might look like the ravings of a madman, this contains all the moral panic the right / far right and republicans have been playing on during the last few years:
It's filled with a deep hate of the left, while trying to present a malformed "ecological" society (based on the most violent natural selection), with all the fears you could imagine around AI, gene editing, mass control, ... While it might have looked crazy in 1995, this is the exact same discourse that is going on in the Trump & consorts circles nowadays.
Sure there are some (very) rare observations about the impact of work on our well being, but those small observations are drowned inside a maelstrom of unfinished thoughts tackling society as a whole without really any understanding. This book has the pretense of intellectualism but doesn't hold in the details.
I think I'll close by one of the rare quote that hit me as containing a semblance of truth:
"It might be argued that the human race would never be foolish enough to hand over all the power to the machines. But we are suggesting neither that the human race would voluntarily turn power over to the machines nor that the machines would willfully seize power. What we do suggest is that the human race might easily permit itself to drift into a position of such dependence on the machines that it would have no practical choice but to accept all of the machines' decisions.
As society and the problems that face it become more and more complex and machines become more and more intelligent, people will let machines make more of their decisions for them, simply because machine-made decisions will bring better result than man-made ones. Eventually a stage may be reached at which the decisions necessary to keep the system running will be so complex that human beings will be incapable of making them intelligently."
