I loved parts of this, such as the thrice embroidered overalls, the genuine child logic and dialogue, the giant box, the day when everything goes wrong while her husband is out of town...
I was shocked when I heard of the reception she received when she arrived at the hospital to deliver her third child. The woman asked her occupation, but when given the answer of ‘author' said that she would instead write ‘housewife'. Additionally, the woman inquired if the child was legitimate.
Even understanding the frustrations of a child going overboard with a role model and that this took place in ‘another time', I was offended and disappointed that her husband told the daughter's teacher that her childlessness was unwomanly.
It was also difficult as a modern reader to hear about her smoking while pregnant, again I understand the different time.
Slow pacing; characters that are difficult to like, relate to, understand; unnecessary gross/bathroom humor; and weak connections.
Also, at the end there is ‘The Necklace' short story by Guy de Maupassant. It is a poor reproduction as it trims the story down further, skipping things like the husband suggesting she wear flowers, that when he gives her money for the dress that he is giving up his own pleasure of shooting, that he fell asleep at the party OR the best yet, that he suggested that she write to her friend to gain more time, saying she had the broken clasp and was going to get it mended! This last skipped detail would strengthen the connection of the stories, and is just sloppy.
Additionally, only diamonds are mentioned to be in the necklace — and the story is commonly known by a secondary title: ‘The Diamond Necklace' — so why are there sapphires?
Felt oddly young, it felt it would have been better as a visual story, but only marginally so.
I'm having a hard time figuring out why I was disappointed; was it the pacing, or perhaps it felt like a mixture of cliches or just too predictable? Was it the reader?
Or maybe just myself in that I expected more from something that had ‘Neil Gaiman' on it.
3rd grade teacher read this aloud in parts to the class. When I was young and learning about civil rights in grade school I was always curious – but nervous to ask about– about how people other than black people were treated in the US. This book does a good job addressing part of that question.
However, many of the kids were a bit confused and thought that the kids depicted were black/African American. The teacher did her best to try to explain that they were of Mexican/Latino heritage. As an adult I wish that this book had touched on some of the larger issues such as it being illegal in certain states to speak Spanish at school...until the 1990's in some areas. It is a good introduction to the topic and it might have more informative text in the back after the story.