Read aloud by a creative writing teacher, she has a background in improv, who has an amazing cache of fun voices. Additionally, it made my usually stoic, nonsense only on my terms, third grader laugh out loud with the rest of the kids.
Also, there a certain type of kindness I think it is trying to teach. I thought it was funny, too.
Loved the art! Loved the use of that aqua blue.
The third story (Monsters!) was so satisfying. I thought that the “speech” bubbles being in the shape of the monsters was clever. As well as the ending of him ‘telling' it as a fishing tale (at least that's how I interpreted it).
I liked the first tale ‘Có' but it kind of fizzled in the middle for me. As for the middle story, I felt its depictions were a bit much at times and started to ‘skim'.
I loved certain parts of this and there were decent characterization. Also I laughed at many points.
Draw backs: what school has their senior class start reading Moby Dick in May?! Way to shoe horn in a way for you to make allusions and it kind of broke the suspension of disbelief for me.
There we too many times John Green described the act of peeing.
how is it that the omnicitionary blurb for what a paper town does not show up earlier? Q searched for that phrase but only said that he found it buried in a realestate forum. Either Q is really bad at using the Internet, or plot convenience, either way it weakens the story for me.
Pro-tip: if the only shirt available has a confederate flag on it, turn that shit inside out (although I didn't mind that part)
Really liked near the end the reference to Gene Yang. It's cheesy, but I enjoy cheese from time to time. I enjoyed the portrayal of the father (only ever viewed as from behind the newspaper) and the possibility of the job he never gets the chance to take, but that the readers knows he'll never take.
Probably closer to a 3, but it was easy to get caught up in the characters and their familiar stories.
I was expecting more, but it was ok.
There was some dry humor, as well as a few actually funny parts. Some characters were more likable than others, but they mostly seemed younger than they were supposed to be. I don't think the narrator helped, or that the audio book was clipped into less-than-a-minute segments.
I'll still listen to ‘Looking for Alaska', even though it's the same narration and audio style.
2.5
Unfortunately, the audiobook that I checked out had a faulty disk, so I missed about three chapters (20, 21, and 22), but I still felt that the ending fizzled a little. I didn't want a bow, nor did I expect one, it just felt like he turned off the tap. The chapters were starting to feel more and more like short stories, instead of a cohesive narrative.
There were also some difficult subject matters, and some I felt were a bit over done. As a whole I enjoyed it more than I didn't. If I'm able to find it I'll view the movie as well :)