
Reader, the original is better. I listened to 9 hours of this 12 hour audiobook and then I was disgusted with myself. As the book grew shallower and shallower I could not take another unlikely plot turn - What? My 30 year old sister eloped with what turns out to be a transgender? I need to hop on a plane to assist my perfectly capable parents while in the midst of finally getting together with my true love etc.
In hindsight, the start of the book was the best part. It is a great idea to retell Austens stories, and Joanne Trollope did a perfect job in Sense & Sensibility. Sittenfelds updated plot is even more fun, but poorly executed, alas.
Stopped reading this at 3/4. Loved the witty intellectualism of the dialogues, but in the end the story started to feel artificial and I lost interest. Also, the theme of assisted dying does not interest me that much - the qualms of the sons felt artificial too, since the father was clearly in a bad state and had made up his mind. Anyway, well written, but I could not feel a real soul in the book.
Give me any book by Ann Tyler, any day. Weird plots, drawn out middles, sudden endings: I don't mind. To live inside the thoughts of her mostly very normal, every-day personages is such a joy. Her books are about life itself and the roundabout way we live it.
Plus the memorable lines. My father was so polite he never picked up a phone in mid-ring.
Dit boek staat vol met onzin-zinnen als: ‘De duisternis nam haar rechtmatige plaats weer in.' Of: ‘In de lucht dreven hoge, ronde wolken.'
Wat het leuk maakt zijn de nuchtere, ultrakorte dialogen van de Drenthen, die hevig clashen met die quasi-plechtige, quasi-literaire onzin-zinnen. Maar ik kan me zulk ik-schrijf-literatuur-jongens-zinnen niet herinneren uit Joe Speedboat. Is er iets met T.W. gebeurd of ben ik ze vergeten?
Het verhaal zelf is klein.
Te klein.
Het thema is: eenzaamheid en jeugdtrauma.
De hoofdpersoon is te daadkrachtig voor alle sombere bespiegelingen over hoe zijn moeder hem verliet, veertig jaar geleden. En niet gek genoeg om dat uniform aan te trekken, aan het einde.
Superb. A designer investigates how sustainable our western way of living is and what matters most, if you want change. She translates immeasurable hunches and fears into tangible numbers and actions. Eat no beef. Do not buy new stuff. Her research is backed by scientific institutions. The way she presents her results is extremely fun, clever and insightful: she designs visual graphs in lots of shapes that make the statistics very clear.
A remarkable book. Pleasant and with a light tone. I would almost say optimistical.
Great plot. Great composition: how many different members of a community act and interact and carry the plot forward after something disruptive happens in their midst. Great style, but weirdly repetetive and consistent use of same stylistic devices of repetition and simplification and ... whatsitcalled... Beartown is a city. But not all cities are Beartown. Such phrases. And again. Again. Again.
God almighty, what was Hardy thinking when he wrote this? I have not read up on any of the doubtless hundreds of literary reviews, so let me be blunt and anachronistic: to me Henchard seems an unlucky guy with ADHD and a temper problem who never learns from his faults. Everyone in the book is a flat character. No one really learns anything. Farfrae and Lucette are a weird match - a saint and a devil. The plot is like a 17th century tragedy. Glad this ordeal is over.