Important read for anyone interested in software engineering as a profession.

View

HTR is a good read.

View

Very short (22 page) thesis summarizing material also covered in Before The Quagmire. Provides a handy timeline for the events of the Fall of 1960, and a good reference list of original sources much of which is drawn from JCS archives.

View

I'm not a fan of points-based estimation, but if that's whats on the table, here's how to handle it.

View

A note for my future self. At the time of writing, I am using this edition for quotes and as reference material for a different physics hobby project. As the man himself recommends, always start from first things, and in physics, the first thing is Physics.

I have not read enough to rate it.

View

First read 12+ years ago, just finished 2d read. The general principles of selling haven't changed very much and the book is very convenient for me.

However, I do not recommend this to general readers.

View

Dated, but useful principles, notable obsessing over preparation and quality. I've used this to land clients.

View
View

Ten years post publication, Braithwaite's material is still generally relevant and very much worth spending some time with. The Ruby Programming Language has advanced considerably since publication, and it would be an interesting exercise to bring the examples up to Ruby 3.3 syntax.

View

This was a reread. It's a nicely short book, covers some very basic things, and was a good review. I learned (or relearned) a couple of tricks. Would be a good book for a Rails beginner to read along with an LLM for discussion.

View

This is a really handy book to have for reference. I have the paperback version. I use it cross-check GPT results and as a guide for going deeper into specific topics.

View
View
View

I have the actual book, it's pretty cool, almost 100 years old.

View

Short read and pretty good high level overview. Something to read after having a higher level view of the whole conflict.

View
View
View
View

An excellent lesson in how not to make a martyr.

View

Read maybe 30%, skimmed most of the remaining, was not able to finish it in detail.

I suspect people who like this book will really, really like it, and people who don't, really won't.

View

My rating of 3 reflects my point of view coming from the engineering side. That is, I did not feel this book was overly helpful when I was working mostly as an individual contributor. I might well find a reread more useful being more on the management side.

View

I've read a vast amount of literature over the decades, nearly none of which is listed on my page here on Goodreads. But this was my first read of Heart of Darkness. Fully intend on rereading.

View
View

Read this several years ago, need to reread it.

View