Ratings12
Average rating2.5
Reviews with the most likes.
For some reason, this book just could NOT hold my attention. I was disappointed because I had so looked forward to reading it.
She takes the slightest bit of circumstantial evidence and tries to turn it into fact. She presents situations initially as hypothetical, but then bases later conclusions upon the belief that these are true. When read with an unbiased mind it is clear that the author started with the presumption of guilt and built a convoluted and laughable tale to try and justify her verdict.
first of all, this is the most ambitious book title I've ever experienced.
second of all, I cannot believe what a huge percentage of this is spent talking about Walter Sickert's (allegedly) deformed penis!!!!!!!!!! so much!!!!!!!!
finally, I simply do not care who was Jack the Ripper, not even if he had a normal penis
http://www.frowl.org/worstbestsellers/episode-143-portrait-of-a-killer-jack-the-ripper/